why is andrew jackson on the 20

2 min read 16-04-2025

Andrew Jackson's presence on the $20 bill is a subject of ongoing debate. His legacy is complex and multifaceted, marked by both significant accomplishments and deeply troubling actions. Understanding why he was chosen, and the controversies surrounding that choice, requires exploring his presidency and its lasting impact.

Jackson's Presidency: Achievements and Atrocities

Jackson's supporters point to several key achievements during his time in office (1829-1837). He championed the rights of the "common man," expanding suffrage and fostering a sense of democratic participation. His supporters emphasize his populist appeal and his dismantling of the Second Bank of the United States, which he viewed as a tool of the wealthy elite.

However, Jackson's legacy is heavily overshadowed by his brutal treatment of Native Americans. His administration oversaw the forced removal of thousands of people from their ancestral lands in the southeastern United States, a tragic event known as the Trail of Tears. This act of ethnic cleansing resulted in immense suffering and death. His policies also included the expansion of slavery, further complicating his image.

The Decision to Feature Jackson on the $20

The decision to place Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill was made long ago, in a period where a more nuanced understanding of his presidency was less prevalent. The choice reflected a historical narrative that celebrated Jackson's populist appeal while largely ignoring the darker aspects of his legacy. This narrative, while incomplete, was widespread for many decades.

The "Common Man" Ideal vs. Historical Accuracy

The image of Andrew Jackson as the "common man's" president resonated with many Americans, and this perception was a significant factor in his selection for the bill. However, this narrative often omits his role in perpetuating slavery and violently displacing Native American tribes. The contrast between this idealized image and the historical reality fuels much of the contemporary debate.

The Movement to Replace Jackson

In recent years, there's been a significant push to replace Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill with a woman, specifically Harriet Tubman. This movement reflects a growing awareness of the horrific consequences of Jackson's policies and a desire for a more inclusive representation of American history on our currency.

Arguments for Replacing Jackson

Advocates for replacing Jackson argue that his presence on the $20 bill is a constant reminder of a dark chapter in American history, one that should not be celebrated. They contend that replacing him with a woman who fought for freedom and equality would be a more fitting tribute to American ideals.

Arguments Against Replacing Jackson

While acknowledging Jackson's flaws, some oppose his removal. They argue that removing historical figures due to controversial aspects of their past sets a dangerous precedent. They advocate for a more comprehensive understanding of history, acknowledging both the good and the bad, rather than erasing problematic figures entirely.

The Ongoing Debate and the Future of the $20

The debate over Andrew Jackson's place on the $20 bill is not merely a discussion about currency design. It's a reflection of our ongoing struggle to reconcile the complexities of American history and to create a more accurate and inclusive representation of our past. The future of the $20 bill, and the ongoing conversation surrounding it, will undoubtedly continue to shape the way we understand and teach American history. This ongoing discussion is vital to fostering a more complete and accurate understanding of our nation's past. The complexities of Jackson’s legacy are crucial for informed discussion and a balanced perspective of our history.